Oni Science
  • Home
  • Environment
  • Humans
  • Nature
  • Physics
  • Space
  • Tech
  • Video
  • Contact Us
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
Skip to content
Oni Science
Your Daily Science News
  • Environment
  • Humans
  • Nature
  • Physics
  • Space
  • Tech
  • Video
  • Contact Us
    • About us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Amazon Disclaimer
    • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer
Tech

People Who Don’t Exist Look More Real Than Actual People, Study Finds

January 26, 2023 by admin 0 Comments

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on Pinterest
Share on LinkedIn

Even if you think you are good at analyzing faces, research shows many people cannot reliably distinguish between photos of real faces and images that have been computer-generated.

This is particularly problematic now that computer systems can create realistic-looking photos of people who don’t exist.

Recently, a fake LinkedIn profile with a computer-generated profile picture made the news because it successfully connected with US officials and other influential individuals on the networking platform, for example. Counter-intelligence experts even say that spies routinely create phantom profiles with such pictures to home in on foreign targets over social media.

These deep fakes are becoming widespread in everyday culture which means people should be more aware of how they’re being used in marketing, advertising and social media. The images are also being used for malicious purposes, such as political propaganda, espionage and information warfare.

Three human faces that look realistic, but they were generated by a computer
These realistic faces were all generated by a computer. (NVIDIA/thispersondoesnotexist.com)

Making them involves something called a deep neural network, a computer system that mimics the way the brain learns. This is “trained” by exposing it to increasingly large data sets of real faces.

In fact, two deep neural networks are set against each other, competing to produce the most realistic images. As a result, the end products are dubbed GAN images, where GAN stands for Generative Adversarial Networks. The process generates novel images that are statistically indistinguishable from the training images.

In our study published in iScience, we showed that a failure to distinguish these artificial faces from the real thing has implications for our online behavior. Our research suggests the fake images may erode our trust in others and profoundly change the way we communicate online.

My colleagues and I found that people perceived GAN faces to be even more real-looking than genuine photos of actual people’s faces. While it’s not yet clear why this is, this finding does highlight recent advances in the technology used to generate artificial images.

And we also found an interesting link to attractiveness: faces that were rated as less attractive were also rated as more real.

Less attractive faces might be considered more typical and the typical face may be used as a reference against which all faces are evaluated. Therefore, these GAN faces would look more real because they are more similar to mental templates that people have built from everyday life.

But seeing these artificial faces as authentic may also have consequences for the general levels of trust we extend to a circle of unfamiliar people – a concept known as “social trust”.

We often read too much into the faces we see, and the first impressions we form guide our social interactions. In a second experiment that formed part of our latest study, we saw that people were more likely to trust information conveyed by faces they had previously judged to be real, even if they were artificially generated.

It is not surprising that people put more trust in faces they believe to be real. But we found that trust was eroded once people were informed about the potential presence of artificial faces in online interactions. They then showed lower levels of trust, overall – independently of whether the faces were real or not.

This outcome could be regarded as useful in some ways, because it made people more suspicious in an environment where fake users may operate. From another perspective, however, it may gradually erode the very nature of how we communicate.

In general, we tend to operate on a default assumption that other people are basically truthful and trustworthy. The growth in fake profiles and other artificial online content raises the question of how much their presence and our knowledge about them can alter this “truth default” state, eventually eroding social trust.

Changing our defaults

The transition to a world where what’s real is indistinguishable from what’s not could also shift the cultural landscape from being primarily truthful to being primarily artificial and deceptive.

If we are regularly questioning the truthfulness of what we experience online, it might require us to re-deploy our mental effort from the processing of the messages themselves to the processing of the messenger’s identity. In other words, the widespread use of highly realistic, yet artificial, online content could require us to think differently – in ways we hadn’t expected to.

In psychology, we use a term called “reality monitoring” for how we correctly identify whether something is coming from the external world or from within our brains. The advance of technologies that can produce fake, yet highly realistic, faces, images and video calls means reality monitoring must be based on information other than our own judgments.

It also calls for a broader discussion of whether humankind can still afford to default to truth.

It’s crucial for people to be more critical when evaluating digital faces. This can include using reverse image searches to check whether photos are genuine, being wary of social media profiles with little personal information or a large number of followers, and being aware of the potential for deepfake technology to be used for nefarious purposes.

The next frontier for this area should be improved algorithms for detecting fake digital faces. These could then be embedded in social media platforms to help us distinguish the real from the fake when it comes to new connections’ faces.

Manos Tsakiris, Professor of Psychology, Director of the Centre for the Politics of Feelings, Royal Holloway University of London

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

This article was originally published by Sciencealert.com. Read the original article here.

Articles You May Like

A Seismologist Explains The Science of The Devastating Türkiye-Syria Earthquake
Jupiter Overtakes Saturn as The Planet With The Most Known Moons
An Incredible Thing Happens When Dolphins And Humans Team Up
Astronomers Find What May Be a Habitable World 31 Light-Years Away
Millions Are at Risk of Flooding Due to Climate Change – But Not Where You’d Think

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Articles

  • Codebreakers Have Deciphered The Lost Letters of Mary, Queen of Scots
  • Millions Are at Risk of Flooding Due to Climate Change – But Not Where You’d Think
  • Astronomers Pinpoint The Mysterious ‘Engine’ of a Super-Powerful Intergalactic Light
  • JWST Has Accidentally Detected a Tiny Asteroid ‘Hidden’ Between Mars And Jupiter
  • A Seismologist Explains The Science of The Devastating Türkiye-Syria Earthquake
  • Ancient Jurassic Predator Emerged From Ghost Ancestor, Scientists Say
  • Scientists Are Making Catfish Hybrids With Alligator DNA For Us to Eat
  • Neanderthals Hunted Giant Elephants Much Larger Than The Ones Today
  • ‘Extinct’ Coronaviruses Still Thrive in North America, Just Not in Humans
  • More Life Than We Ever Realized Could Survive in The Deep Dark of The Ocean

Space

  • Astronomers Pinpoint The Mysterious ‘Engine’ of a Super-Powerful Intergalactic Light
  • JWST Has Accidentally Detected a Tiny Asteroid ‘Hidden’ Between Mars And Jupiter
  • A Planet Almost Exactly Earth’s Size Has Been Found 72 Light-Years Away
  • NASA Rover Encounters Spectacular Metal Meteorite on Mars
  • Jupiter Overtakes Saturn as The Planet With The Most Known Moons

Physics

  • Scientists Discover a Weird New Form of Ice That May Change How We Think About Water
  • A Lost Interview With The ‘Father of The Big Bang’ Was Just Discovered
  • This Physicist Says Electrons Spin in Quantum Physics After All. Here’s Why
  • Physicists Break Record Firing a Laser Down Their University Corridor
  • Scientists Have Built a Macroscopic Tractor Beam Using Laser Light

Archives

  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • March 2017
  • November 2016

Categories

  • Environment
  • Humans
  • Nature
  • Physics
  • Space
  • Tech
  • Video

Useful Links

  • Contact Us
  • About us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Amazon Disclaimer
  • DMCA / Copyrights Disclaimer

Recent Posts

  • Codebreakers Have Deciphered The Lost Letters of Mary, Queen of Scots
  • Millions Are at Risk of Flooding Due to Climate Change – But Not Where You’d Think
  • Astronomers Pinpoint The Mysterious ‘Engine’ of a Super-Powerful Intergalactic Light
  • JWST Has Accidentally Detected a Tiny Asteroid ‘Hidden’ Between Mars And Jupiter
  • A Seismologist Explains The Science of The Devastating Türkiye-Syria Earthquake

Copyright © 2023 by Oni Science. All rights reserved. All articles, images, product names, logos, and brands are property of their respective owners. All company, product and service names used in this website are for identification purposes only. Use of these names, logos, and brands does not imply endorsement unless specified. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Powered by WordPress using DisruptPress Theme.